Is my LDS theology broad enough to credit spiritual experiences in other churches?
Is the theology of the other Christian churches broad enough to credit my spiritual experiences?
What are implications of the answers to these two questions?
First, LDS theology teaches of the central role of the Holy Spirit in the lives of individual members, and I, consistent with the reports of many other LDS church members, have experienced a multitude of spiritual things in connection with my faith. Many of these were subtle and mainly projected a spirit of peace and goodness. This same sense has been present regarding things strictly LDS and things more generally Christian. Occasionally, the spiritual influence has been more specific, giving particular directions for my life, insights about important truths, or even warnings about things to avoid. Altogether, these experiences accumulate into a large body of evidence to me that the Spirit of God is a significant presence in my religious life, consistent with the doctrines of the Church.
What about in the lives of persons not in our church? On our mission in NC, we had several long religious discussions with Teresa M., a very charitable and Christian lady who had some attraction to our church. At one point she told of her experience, when she was in her early 20s, on the day when she was baptized in a Pentacostal church. She had such a strong feeling of joy and of the love of Christ. Of the devil? Of the Spirit? Her Christian demeanor and life argued strongly for the latter. Might the Spirit of Truth be present to give its stamp of approval when a person makes a commitment to Christ even if the sponsoring church does not have the fulness of his Gospel? It seems possible.
We know from the scriptures that God reveals truth incrementally–“line upon line and precept upon precept” (Isa 28:10), the milk first and then the meat (1 Cor 3:2; Heb. 5:12), “He granteth unto men according to their desire...in wisdom, all that he seeth fit that they should have” (Alma 29: 4, 8). People may receive of the Light of Christ until the Holy Ghost can work in them (D&C 20:37).
We recall the testimony of a Jewish man who was first converted to Christ and then several years later introduced to the Gospel and baptized by an LDS man he met in the military. Another example is a man who experienced a spiritual call to the Protestant ministry. Eventually, he converted to the LDS Church, and always understood his call as a minister to be a progressive step toward his LDS membership, and the receipt of the Priesthood and temple ordinances.
The promptings of the Spirit are often still and small and sometimes not fully understood. In the book of Mormon, Lamanite converts were baptized by the Spirit and “knew it not” (3 Ne 9:20 ). A recent BYU devotional talk pointed out the need to clarify whether spiritual promptings indicate a general approval or more specific direction.
All of these ideas from LDS sources suggest that the Spirit of Truth works in the lives of people everywhere, leading them to the truths that they are able and willing to receive and seems to encompass spiritual experiences by Latter-day Saints and others not in the Church.
It seems to me that a theology that is not broad enough to account for this range of spiritual experiences is not true.
Race, Priesthood, and Temple Blessings--
3 months ago





