Thursday, June 6, 2019

Two Levels of Spiritual Development

    At an earlier time, I wrote in some detail about the redemptive work that is present in the gospel of Jesus Christ (“Guiltless and Spotless: Fruits of the Great Plan of Salvation,” Nearer to God: The Book of Mormon and the Good News of Christ, Lulu Press, 2012, 143-152).  Drawing upon the Savior’s words in 3 Nephi 27, I distinguished between two processes of spiritual growth and salvation, becoming guiltless and becoming spotless.  The first, guiltless or justification, involves coming unto Christ and includes a person having met the conditions for the atonement to satisfy the demands of divine justice for punishment for one’s sins, and the reception of the Holy Ghost as confirmation that of such forgiveness.  The second process, spotless or sanctification, follows in which a person’s attributes are changed over time to qualify them to dwell in God’s presence.
    In studying the writings of Bruce and Marie Hafen (The Contrite Spirit: How the Temple Helps Us Apply Christ’s Atonement, Deseret Book, 2015), I have discovered additional ways of describing and understanding these processes.  They propose that these two spiritual development processes might be understood as flowing out of differences in the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods:
    "…in 1929 the Lord revealed that He had given certain keys to Peter, James, and John that would be in effect until the Second Coming (see D&C 7:7).  Only a month later, when John the Baptist conferred the Aaronic Priesthood upon Joseph and Oliver, he told them that "he acted under the direction of Peter, James and John, who held the keys of the Priesthood of Melchizedek'' (Joseph Smith-History 1:72). Not long afterward, those same three men conferred that higher priesthood upon Joseph and Oliver (see D&C 27:12-13).
    Less well known is Peter's intriguing appearance at the Kirtland Temple dedication in 1836, a visit that hints at Peter's role with temples.  During the dedication, an angel entered through a window and sat next to Joseph Smith Sr.  The Prophet later told the congregation that this angel was Peter, who had been sent as a messenger to accept the temple dedication.
    Why would the Lord send Peter for that purpose?  Perhaps it was because Peter holds the keys for the Melchizedek Priesthood, and the temple ordinances are the primary ordinances of that priesthood.  Thinking of Peter in this way prompts these further thoughts: The primary ordinances of the Aaronic Priesthood are baptism and the sacrament. Those ordinances are also intertwined with the first principles of the gospel—faith and repentance.
    Could there be a similar interactive relationship between the ordinances of the higher priesthood and some set of higher gospel principles?
    The primary ordinances of the Melchizedek Priesthood are confirmation, priesthood ordination (for brethren), and the endowment and sealing ordinances of the temple.  Those higher ordinances are indeed intertwined with such higher principles as sacrifice and consecration.  Our progression from the preparatory priesthood through the levels of the higher priesthood, fueled along the way by the link between ordinances and principles, suggests an ascending pattern that is anchored in the laws of God that govern our spiritual growth.
    And we learn this sequential pattern in the temple…"  (Hafen & Hafen, The Contrite Spirit, pp. 53-55)
    In D&C 84, these differences are elaborated.  Speaking first about the Melchizedek Priesthood:
19 And this greater priesthood administereth the gospel and holdeth the key of the mysteries of the kingdom, even the key of the knowledge of God.
20 Therefore, in the ordinances thereof, the power of godliness is manifest.
21 And without the ordinances thereof, and the authority of the priesthood, the power of godliness is not manifest unto men in the flesh;
22 For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live.
23 Now this Moses plainly taught to the children of Israel in the wilderness, and sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God;
24 But they hardened their hearts and could not endure his presence; therefore, the Lord in his wrath, for his anger was kindled against them, swore that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory.
25 Therefore, he took Moses out of their midst, and the Holy Priesthood also;
    Then regarding the Aaronic Priesthood:
26 And the lesser priesthood continued, which priesthood holdeth the key of the ministering of angels and the preparatory gospel;
27 Which gospel is the gospel of repentance and of baptism, and the remission of sins, and the law of carnal commandments, which the Lord in his wrath caused to continue with the house of Aaron among the children of Israel until John, whom God raised up, being filled with the Holy Ghost from his mother’s womb.
    Note the differences between the roles, functions, powers, and principles.

I. Names for the two stages
    A. Aaronic:
                Lessor
                Carnal commandments
                Temporal
    B. Melchizedek:
                Greater/higher
                Spiritual commandments

II Keys
    A. Aaronic:
                Ministering of Angels
                Preparatory gospel           
    B. Melchizedek:
                Mysteries of kingdom
                Knowledge of God
                Power of godliness

III. Objectives and Purposes
    A. Aaronic
1. Enter onto the path of discipleship
    Through baptism, a person becomes a member of Christ’s church and makes covenants associated with basic discipleship. 
    Nephi’s teachings about the basic baptismal covenant emphasize the commitment to be obedient to God’s commandments:
5 And now, if the Lamb of God, he being holy, should have need to be baptized by water, to fulfil all righteousness, O then, how much more need have we, being unholy, to be baptized, yea, even by water!
6 And now, I would ask of you, my beloved brethren, wherein the Lamb of God did fulfil all righteousness in being baptized by water?
7 Know ye not that he was holy? But notwithstanding he being holy, he showeth unto the children of men that, according to the flesh he humbleth himself before the Father, and witnesseth unto the Father that he would be obedient unto him in keeping his commandments. (2 Nephi 31:5-7)    According to Alma as he instructed a group of persons about baptism, these covenants include keeping God’s commandments, always standing as a witness for God, and also helping to bear others’ burdens, especially for other members of the Church:
8 And it came to pass that he said unto them: Behold, here are the waters of Mormon (for thus were they called) and now, as ye are desirous to come into the fold of God, and to be called his people, and are willing to bear one another’s burdens, that they may be light;
9 Yea, and are willing to mourn with those that mourn; yea, and comfort those that stand in need of comfort, and to stand as witnesses of God at all times and in all things, and in all places that ye may be in, even until death, that ye may be redeemed of God, and be numbered with those of the first resurrection, that ye may have eternal life—
10 Now I say unto you, if this be the desire of your hearts, what have you against being baptized in the name of the Lord, as a witness before him that ye have entered into a covenant with him, that ye will serve him and keep his commandments, that he may pour out his Spirit more abundantly upon you?   (Mosiah 18:8-10)
    The command to bear one another’s burdens appears to encompass a sort of basic ministering requirement or assignment in regard to other Church members.  It is instructive that in the revelation on priesthood duties given to Joseph Smith, the church ministering duty is mentioned in connection with Teachers and Priests in the Aaronic Priesthood, rather than offices of the Melchizedek Priesthood:
46 The priest’s duty is to preach, teach, expound, exhort, and baptize, and administer the sacrament,
47 And visit the house of each member, and exhort them to pray vocally and in secret and attend to all family duties.
48 And he may also ordain other priests, teachers, and deacons.
49 And he is to take the lead of meetings when there is no elder present;
50 But when there is an elder present, he is only to preach, teach, expound, exhort, and baptize,
51 And visit the house of each member, exhorting them to pray vocally and in secret and attend to all family duties.
52 In all these duties the priest is to assist the elder if occasion requires.
53 The teacher’s duty is to watch over the church always, and be with and strengthen them;
54 And see that there is no iniquity in the church, neither hardness with each other, neither lying, backbiting, nor evil speaking;
55 And see that the church meet together often, and also see that all the members do their duty.    This distinction illustrates the differences and relationships between the spiritual functions of the two priesthood levels.
The Melchizedek builds upon the foundation of the Aaronic.  The lessor  principles, commandments, and even the ordinances are not bypassed or dismissed when practicing the higher level.  Rather, the higher stage adds to the former and assist us in pressing on to the Christlike life.  As Joseph’s revision of the Book of Hebrew states: “Therefore, not leaving the priniciples of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God...[and] baptisms” (JST, Hebrews 6:1-2, see Hafen & Hafen The Contrite Spirit, p. 58)

2. Become children of Christ
13 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, I know that if ye shall follow the Son, with full purpose of heart, acting no hypocrisy and no deception before God, but with real intent, repenting of your sins, witnessing unto the Father that ye are willing to take upon you the name of Christ, by baptism... (2 Nephi 31:13 , also see Givens & Givens, “Heals,” ch. 7)
    When we take Christ’s name upon us, it might be said that we join the family of Christ as his adopted children, and also repledge our desire each week as we take the sacrament.  As our spiritual father, the Savior seeks to parent us through the process of cleansing and growth that will lead us to eternal life.

3. Relieve us from the burden of our sins/forgiveness/remission/justification
    A prime blessing of the atonement of Christ becomes available at and through baptism, that is, that his suffering pays the price to justice for our individual sins and we are forgiven as we repent.
30 And we know that justification through the grace of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is just and true; (D&C 20:30)
17 Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
18 And then are ye in this strait and narrow path which leads to eternal life; yea, ye have entered in by the gate; ye have done according to the commandments of the Father and the Son; and ye have received the Holy Ghost, which witnesses of the Father and the Son, unto the fulfilling of the promise which he hath made [receiving forgiveness/remission of sins], that if ye entered in by the way ye should receive. (2 Nephi 31:17-18)

4. Qualify us to possess the companionship of the Holy Ghost
    Nephi describes how the Gift of the Holy Ghost is a part of the baptismal process:
12 And also, the voice of the Son came unto me, saying: He that is baptized in my name, to him will the Father give the Holy Ghost, like unto me; wherefore, follow me, and do the things which ye have seen me do.
13 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, I know that if ye shall follow the Son, with full purpose of heart, acting no hypocrisy and no deception before God, but with real intent, repenting of your sins, witnessing unto the Father that ye are willing to take upon you the name of Christ, by baptism—yea, by following your Lord and your Savior down into the water, according to his word, behold, then shall ye receive the Holy Ghost; yea, then cometh the baptism of fire and of the Holy Ghost; and then can ye speak with the tongue of angels, and shout praises unto the Holy One of Israel.  (2 Nephi 31:12-13)
    Possessing the companionship of the Holy Ghost has several aspects.  First, at baptism we are qualified to receive the laying on of hands for the Gift of the Holy Ghost, in the which we are directed or commanded to “receive” the Holy Ghost by a priesthood representative.  Then on a regular basis on Sundays, we partake of the sacrament, through which we renew the promise “that [we] are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son, and always remember him and keep his commandments which he has given them; that [we] may always have his Spirit to be with [us]. (D&C 20:77, and also 79).  Finally we must continually seek the companionship of the Holy Ghost in other ways including continual repenting as needed.  President Nelson has emphasized continuing and even daily focus on repentance:
    “Nothing is more liberating, more ennobling, or more crucial to our individual progression than is a regular, daily focus on repentance. Repentance is not an event; it is a process. It is the key to happiness and peace of mind. When coupled with faith, repentance opens our access to the power of the Atonement of Jesus Christ.” (President Russell M. Nelson, “We Can Do Better and Be Better”, General Conference Priesthood Session, April 2019)

5. Individual salvation
    The gospel objectives and blessings described above,  point toward and prepare us as individuals for salvation in the kingdom of heaven.

    B. Melchizedek
1. Sanctification
    Recall that sanctification was the objective Moses had for the children of Isreal while the Melchizedek Priesthood was available to them, prior to their rebellion in the wildernesss and the instigation of the lesser Mosiac law.
    Now this Moses plainly taught to the children of Israel in the wilderness, and sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God; (D&C 84:23)    Sanctification means becoming a pure and holy person, fit to dwell in God’s presence.
    Now this is the commandment: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day. (3 Nephi 27:20)
    And we know also, that sanctification through the grace of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is just and true, to all those who love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength. (D&C 20:31)
    Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
    And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot. (Moroni 10:32-33)

2. Endure to the end
    Nephi, in his instruction on how to get onto the path to eternal life through baptism and the receipt of the Holy Ghost, supplies a very brief introduction to the higher level spiritual processes.
    Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life. (2 Ne 31:20)
    How do we endure to the end? There is more to this idea than simply putting up with a bad situation (enduring life’s vicissitudes ) until death brings release.   President Joseph Fielding Smith suggested that enduring to the end involves the acquisition of those attributes that bring happiness.
    “We must so live as to acquire the attributes of godliness and become the kind of people who can enjoy the glory and wonders of the celestial kingdom.” (Ensign, Nov. 1971, p. 5.)
    There are clues to answer this question in Nephi’s brief statement:
        – Press forward with a steadfastness in Christ
        – Having a brightness of hope
        – Having a love of God and all men
        – Feasting on the word of Christ

3.  Become like Christ
    As Joseph taught in the School of the Prophets, “What situation must a person be in in order to be saved?... If we can find a saved being, we may ascertain without much difficulty what all others must be in order to be saved.”  Christ “is the prototype or standard of salvation; or in other words,... a saved being,... a just and holy being.” (Givens and Givens, The God that Heals, p. 50, citing Lectures on Faith (Salt Lake City: Deseret book, 1985, 75-76)
    This doctrine is taught by Mormon:
    Wherefore, my beloved brethren, pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart, that ye may be filled with this love, which he hath bestowed upon all who are true followers of his Son, Jesus Christ; that ye may become the sons of God; that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is; that we may have this hope; that we may be purified even as he is pure. (Moroni 7:48)
    Likewise by John:
    Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
    Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
    And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure. (1 John 3:1-3)

4. Receive the fulness of the Holy Ghost
    In the inspired dedicatory prayer for the Kirtland temple, Joseph Smith implied that there may be a higher level granting of the blessings of the Spirit, through the temple.
    And do thou grant, Holy Father, that all those who shall worship in this house may be taught words of wisdom out of the best books, and that they may seek learning even by study, and also by faith, as thou hast said;
    And that they may grow up in thee, and receive a fulness of the Holy Ghost, and be organized according to thy laws, and be prepared to obtain every needful thing;  (D&C 109:14-15)
    Here are some blessings that might come through the fulness of the Holy Ghost:
        1. Become totally at home in the temple, to be “established” in the words of Joseph’s prayer.  Learn how to worship the Lord in and through the temple.  “We ask thee, Holy Father, to establish the people that shall worship, and honorably hold a name and standing in this thy house, to all generations and for eternity” (D&C 109:24)
        2. Receive doctrinal revelation– understandings which had been “hid from before the world was.” (D&C 124:38)  Especially these might be new insights from the temple ordinances about the great plan of salvation and the atonement of Christ.
        3. Receive specific instruction regarding things we individually need to do to keep the covenants we have made, specifically, obedience, sacrifice, treating others according to the higher law of the gospel, personal purity, and answering the call of our Church leaders and the Lord with total devotion.
        4. Learn specific ways that we can better minister to others, especially those of our own family and others for whom we have particular ministering responsibility.  This includes emphasis on preparing them to enter and love the temple and the performing of work for the dead.
        5. Experience God’s presence.  The temple is a place where God manifests himself to his people (D&C 109:5).  Also experience the appreciation of our kindred dead, as we labor in their behalf.

5. Perfection/finishing/completeness
    In a 1995 conference address, President Nelson examines the meaning of the goal of perfection, by concluding that this does not mean the absence of mistakes or errors.  In Matt. 5:48, “Be ye therefore perfect,” the term was translated from the Greek teleios, which means “complete” or reaching a distant end.  The Savior gave the challenge to is disciples to be perfect but gave only his Father in Heaven as the model.  Speaking of his death and subsequent resurrection, stated that on “the third day I shall be perfected” (Luke 13:32).  Later, when teaching the Nephites, he gave them this same command, but listed himself along with his Father as a perfected personage (3 Nephi 12:48).   President Nelson concludes that “Eternal perfection is reserved for those who overcome all things and inherit the fulness of the Father in his heavenly mansions [resurrection included]. Perfection consists in gaining eternal life?—the kind of life that God lives.  (Russell M. Nelson, “Perfection Pending,” October 1995 general conference)
    Moroni also describes the process of perfection with an emphasis on the power of Christ’s atonement:
    Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
    And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot. (Moroni 10:32-33)

6. Eternal Life/the kind of life that God has
    As defined above by President Nelson,
eternal life is the kind of life that our Heavenly Father has.
    For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man. (Moses 1:39)

7. Exaltation (in families)
    This eternal life we are speaking of is also identified by the term exaltation.  Among the most critical elements of this state is enduring, eternal marriages and family relationships, including the addition of spirit children to that family.
    In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;
    And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];
    And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.
    He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase.  (D&C 131:1-4)
    And again, verily I say unto you, if a man marry a wife by my word, which is my law, and by the new and everlasting covenant, and it is sealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of promise, by him who is anointed, unto whom I have appointed this power and the keys of this priesthood; and it shall be said unto them—Ye shall come forth in the first resurrection; and if it be after the first resurrection, in the next resurrection; and shall inherit thrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths—then shall it be written in the Lamb’s Book of Life, that he shall commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, and if ye abide in my covenant, and commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, it shall be done unto them in all things whatsoever my servant hath put upon them, in time, and through all eternity; and shall be of full force when they are out of the world; and they shall pass by the angels, and the gods, which are set there, to their exaltation and glory in all things, as hath been sealed upon their heads, which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the seeds forever and ever.
    Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from everlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be gods, because they have all power, and the angels are subject unto them.  (D&C 132:19-20)
    Blessings associated with exaltation are far greater that those of the Aaronic Priesthood level of individual salvation.

IV. Behavior Standard
    A. Aaronic
    Active in the Church.  In our Church culture, we often speak of people and judge them in regard to their church activity.  They may be active, less-active, or inactive, or something in-between.  Typically, we base these judgements on our observation of their external behavior as to whether they generally attend meetings, or perhaps whether they hold a church calling.  They show compliance with at least the letter of the law.  Hafen and Hafen suggest that being active in the Church “is only the emerging stage... of spiritual development”. But there is the need for a “more mature level of spiritual development.” (Hafen and Hafen, The Contrite Spirit, 2015, p. 216)

    B. Melchizedek
    Consecrated Discipleship.  A higher standard seems more consistent with obedience to the spirit of the laws of God.  Elder Neal Maxwell has said that “it would change the entire Church if in every ward we could have three or four more families who were truly consecrated disciples.” (Cited in The Contrite Spirit, p. 216)
    “Ultimate consecration is the yielding up of oneself to God. Heart, soul, and mind were the encompassing words of Christ in describing the first commandment, which is constantly, not periodically, operative (see Matt. 22:37). If kept, then our performances will, in turn, be fully consecrated for the lasting welfare of our souls (see 2 Ne. 32:9).” (Neal Maxwell, “Consecrate Thy Performance,” April 2002 general conference)

V. Application of Christ’s atonement
    A. Aaronic:
            Remission of sins
            Companionship of Holy Ghost

    B. Melchizedek:
            Sanctification,
            Perfection,
            Acquire nature of Christ

VI. Principles
    A. Aaronic:
            Faith
            Repentance
    Faith and repentance are clearly identified with the Aaronic Priesthood spiritual stage through the Fourth Article of Faith as the first principles of the Gospel that qualify a person to enter the Church.  However, they never cease to be foundational to all spiritual development, faith also being present with hope and charity as the triad of principles which have been identified in many sources as the three primary elements in a mature religious life.  Also, the lifelong need for daily repentance no matter where a person is on the spiritual progress ladder is also critical, as taught by President Russell M. Nelson (President Russell M. Nelson, “We Can Do Better and Be Better”, General Conference Priesthood Session, April 2019).

    B. Melchizedek:
             Faith
             Hope
             Charity (Ether 12:28)
             Meekness, contrite spirit
    Faith, hope, and charity are three primary elements of a religious life and spiritual progress.  These three principles were identified together by the apostle Paul (1 Cor. 13) and appear together by name in five Book of Mormon passages.  Those who have faith, hope and charity will always abound in good works (Alma 7:24), and are acceptable before God (Moroni 7:44).  These qualities bring persons unto Christ (Ether 12:28) and qualify one to be saved in the kingdom of God (Moroni 10:21).  See also Alma 13:29, 2 Nephi 31:18-20, Moroni 8:25-26 which substitute the word love for charity.  These passages and others in the Book of Mormon that reference faith, hope, and charity, provide wonderful insights into the meaning of these concepts and explain how the three qualities work together in the life of a follower of Christ to prepare a person for exaltation in the Kingdom of God.  All of these principles are intimately connected to the influence of the Spirit. 
    Faith is following a course of action led by the Holy Spirit.  The Spirit gives initial evidence of things unseen which needed to be acted upon (Hebrews 11; Alma 32:21).  As we act upon this evidence, the spirit provides confirmation to us that our actions are pleasing to God (Lectures on Faith 3:5, 6; Ether 12:6; Hebrews 11).  In both the Old Testament Hebrew and the New Testament Greek, words translated as faith or faithful typically have the meaning of steadfastness, reliable, trustworthiness.
    Hope is having an assurance, from the Spirit, of forgiveness, of being born of God, of the receipt of the Spirit, that one is on the path to eternal life (Alma 22:15-17).  Hope is firm (Alma 34:14).  The hope that follows faith, with surety, makes an anchor to the souls of men, makes them sure and steadfast, always abounding in good works ((Ether 12:4).  After faith, repentance, baptism, comes the visitation of the Holy Ghost, which fills with hope (Moroni 8:25-26).  In the Old Testament Hebrew, some of the words from which the word hope is translated have the meaning of assurance, confidence, security, safety, and trust.
    Charity is having a disposition, fed by the Spirit, to bless the lives of others.  Charity is the pure love of Christ, and endures forever (Moroni 7:47; 2 Nephi 26:30; Moroni 8:17).  After faith, repentance, baptism, comes the visitation of the Holy Ghost, which fills with hope and also charity (Moroni 8:25-26).  See Enos 1:9-11; Alma 36:24 for examples of the charity which follows true conversion. 
    According to the apostle Paul, charity is the greatest virtue of all.  Concern for others’ well-being and a willingness to make others’ needs preeminent is a major product of the work of the Spirit in an individual’s life and evidence that sanctification is occurring.
    At least two more virtues have been suggested as related to a higher level of spiritual progress, having a contrite spirit and meekness.
    Having a contrite spirit.  Along with having a broken heart, having a contrite spirit is the new law of sacrifice replacing animal sacrifices, after the old law was done away with through Christ’s suffering and resurrection:
    And ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings.
    And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit. And whoso cometh unto me with a broken heart and a contrite spirit, him will I baptize with fire and with the Holy Ghost, even as the Lamanites, because of their faith in me at the time of their conversion, were baptized with fire and with the Holy Ghost, and they knew it not. (3 Nephi 9:19-20)
    Here is a definition of the contrite spirit:
    “A contrite Spirit is eager to repent.  It accepts responsibility for its own weakness and choices with a willingness to be corrected and desires to “learn of [Him] and listen to [His] words” (D&C 19:23).  The Latin root for the word contrite means to wear away, as in rubbing rough edges smooth.  Like the well-disciplined horse, a contrite spirit is that is softening and yielding, learning to be responsive to the Master, submissive to His every command, and willing to sacrifice its own will in faith that His will is for the highest good (see Isaiah 55:9).
    “A contrite spirit does not hide.  It seeks Jesus, compelled by faith in Chist’s ability to save and heal. “Will ye not now return unto me?” He pleads, “and repent of your sins, and be converted, that I may heal you?” (3 Nephi 9:13).
    “If we have a broken heart and a contrite spirit and we keep our covenants by sacrifice, then the Lord “will cause [us] to bring forth as a very fruitful tree which is planted in a goodly land, by a pure stream, that yieldeth much precious fruit” (D&C 97:8-9).  In His next breath, after making such a sublime promise, the Lord command His people to build a temple– a portal, if you will, that gives us access to such a “goodly land.”  It is through the sacred patterns of the temple– the multilayered template– that he can make a tree of life out of us.”  (Hafen & Hafen, The Contrite Spirit, 2015, xv-xvi).
    Meekness. 
    According to the prophet Mormon, meekness is a prerequisite to receiving the gifts of faith and hope. (Mormon 7:42-44)
    As stated by Elder David Bednar,
    “Meekness is a defining attribute of the Redeemer and is distinguished by righteous responsiveness, willing submissiveness, and strong self-restraint...
    “The Christlike quality of meekness often is misunderstood in our contemporary world.  Meekness is strong, not weak; active, not passive; courageous, not timid; restrained, not excessive; modest, not self-aggrandizing; and gracious, not brash.  A meek person is not easily provoked, pretentious, or overbearing and readily acknowledges the accomplishments of others...
    “Whereas humility generally denotes dependence upon God and the constant need for His guidance and support, a distinguishing characteristic of meekness is a particular spiritual receptivity to learning both from the Holy Ghost and from people who may seem less capable, experienced, or educated, who may not hold important positions, or who otherwise may not appear to have much to contribute...
    “Meekness is an attribute developed through desire, the righteous exercise of moral agency, and striving always to retain a remission of our sins.  It also is a spiritual gift for which we appropriately can seek.  We should remember, however, the purposes for which such a blessing is given, even to benefit and serve the children of God...    “As we come unto and follow the Savior, we increasingly and incrementally are enabled to become more like Him.  We are empowered by the Spirit with disciplined self-restraint and a settled and calm demeanor.  Thus, meek is what we become as disciples of the Master...” (“Meek and Lowly of Heart”,  By Elder David A. Bednar, April 2018 General Conference)

VII. Ordinances
    A. Aaronic:         
            Outward ordinances
                – Baptism
                – Sacrament
    B. Melchizedek:    
            Higher ordinances
                – Endowment
                – Temple sealings

VIII. Covenants and laws
    A. Aaronic: 
        – Obedience
        – Discipleship (remembering Christ, witnessing of him, taking his name) (D&C:20:37)
        – Bear others’ burdens (Mosiah 18:8-10)

    B. Melchizedek:
        – Obedience
        – Sacrifice
        – Gospel/higher law/Christ-like interpersonal relationships
        – Marital/sexual faithfulness
        – Consecration
        – Obey rites/ordinances of marriage
    Similar to earlier comaprisons, the basic Aaronic Priesthood covenants remain foundational fore those of the higher level.  Obedience is the governing law across both levels, and in addition, the Melchizedek Priesthood laws could be viewed as increasingly specific areas of required obedience.
    The higher law of the gospel may be particularly an extension of the covenant to bear others’ burdens.  It appears to encompass actions pertaining to other persons, including both behaviors but also motivations behind the behaviors.  “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not _____, but I say unto you, Your heart also needs to be right in that _____.” 
    The apostle Paul summarized all of the commandments as “if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself” (Romans 13:9).

IX. Remembrance/renewal/recovenant ordinances
    A. Aaronic:         
            – Sacrament
    “When we are baptized, we take upon ourselves the sacred name of Jesus Christ.  Taking upon us His name is one of the most significant experiences we have in life …
    “Each week in sacrament meeting we promise to remember the atoning sacrifice of our Savior as we renew our baptismal covenant.  We promise to do as the Savior did?—to be obedient to the Father and always keep His commandments. (Robert D. Hales, “The Covenant of Baptism: To Be in the Kingdom and of the Kingdom,” Ensign, Nov. 2000)
    The sacramental prayer largely focuses on the our baptismal/Aaronic Priesthood level promises, always remembering Christ and his atonement and keeping his commandments.  Some authorities have suggested that the scope of the sacrament includes renewal of all the covenants we have made, including those of the temple:
    “Elder Delbert L. Stapley instructed us in this when he said about covenants: “The gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ is a covenant between God and his people. … When baptized by an authorized servant of God, we covenant to do God’s will and to obey his commandments. … By partaking of the Sacrament we renew all covenants entered into with the Lord and pledge ourselves to take upon us the name of his Son, to always remember him and keep his commandments” (in Conference Report, October 1965, 14, cited by L. Tom Perry, “As Now We Take the Sacrament”, General Conference address, April 2006).
    Taking the sacrament appears to be another case in which an Aaron Priesthood feature is foundational and encompasses the full range of lower and higher Gospel principles.  We ought to see in this ordinance a focus extending to every promise we have made to God.  However this does not preclude the existence of other means to assist us to review the higher covenants we have made and recommit to a determination to their fulfillment.

    B. Melchizedek:    
            – Endowment (for the dead)
    Bruce and Marie Hafen (pp. 53-62, The Contrite Spirit: How the Temple Helps Us Apply Christ’s Atonement, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2015) have suggested that the process of spiritual development and the receipt of Gospel blessings may be thought of as having two progressive levels, the higher level centering around the instruction and ordinances of the temple.  The culmination of each of these levels might be thought of as our experiencing a priesthood ordinance that is designed by God to remind us regularly of the sacred covenants we have entered into and to allow us to express our continuing desire and intention to obey the respective promises.  These ordinances are also rich in their symbolic reminders of the monumental sacrifice of the Savior and our debt to him in making these blessings possible.  As shown below, each level has its specific blessings, ordinances, covenants, and principles, and finally, a covenant remembrance/renewal ordinance.  For the Aaronic Priesthood level, that ordinance is the sacrament.  For the Melchizedek Priesthood level, the endowment for the dead, especially the culminating veil ceremony, may fill the same function for us.
     Fiona and Terryl Givens point specifically to the spiritual power contained in the temple endowment veil ceremony:
    “Latter-day Saints are fortunate in that the temple gives them access to an experience of the Atonement's power that is even more sacred and impactful than the weekly sacrament.  Joseph's greatest act of synthesis, wherein he drew Old Testament typology and New Testament teaching into harmony, was evident in the way he was inspired to depict temple architecture and design temple ritual so as to bring all things together in Christ.  The key to his final effort may have been his reading of Hebrews and the light it shed on Abraham's unusual rite in Genesis 15.  In that account, in token of the covenant he has entered into with God (the new and everlasting covenant), Abraham is commanded to sacrifice a heifer, a goat, and a ram (along with two birds).  He then divides each large carcass into two halves.  Subsequently, as Moses experienced before his theophany and Joseph before his, Abraham experiences "an horror of great darkness."  And then the divine manifestation occurs: "a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp ... passed between those pieces," following which the Lord personally affirms his covenant with Abraham.
    “Explicating Old Testament sacrifices in light of the new covenant, the author of Hebrews invites the Christian himself–“to complete the pilgrim's journey by entering into the presence of God himself– “to enter into the holiest.”  And the meaning of all prior sacrificial victims now becomes clear, as the author explains that entry into God's presence can only be "by the blood of Christ."  Christians all know that the sacrificial animal is a type and foreshadowing of the Savior's death.  But the writer of the letter to the Hebrews pushes the analogy further.  We “enter into the holiest by the blood of Christ."  We effectively pass through Christ’s broken body, as the lamp of the Lord passed through the severed sacrificial creatures, and back into God's presence.  The Atonement is the pain-drenched portal through which alone access is to be found.  And in the author's final invocation of symbolism, he directs our minds to the image of the temple veil, which becomes the physical counterpart to the body of Christ, through which we pass into the holiest place. The writer of the letter says this explicitly: The “new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us” is “through the veil, that is to say, his flesh.”
    “In our temples, as in the Jewish temple, the veil represents the portal into the divine presence. The temple veil, the emblem of Christ's own flesh, was torn at the crucifixion, suggesting that only through the broken body of the atoning Savior was access into God's presence possible for all. This startling image, replicated in the temples of the Latter-day Saints, captures the quintessence of the temple's purpose.  It signifies the eternal human saga by which men and women progressively constitute fuller and richer relationship to Divine Parents.  The story tracks their pilgrimage from incarnate spirits, through adoption into Christ's family, assuming greater levels of commitment and higher standards of holiness, entering into binding covenants that reify and extend human and divine connectedness, until, cleansed and sanctified by the sacrificial offering of Christ's own flesh, they enter into the divine presence, part of an eternal sociality with those they love. The rituals of the temple are thus where the Church's most concentrated liturgical forms are found, and they crescendo with palpable crucifixion imagery at the veil, that symbolic, porous membrane joining heaven and earth.  It  is through the Atonement, through the severed flesh of Christ, typified in sacrifices that hark back to Adam himself, that all find full  incorporation into the Heavenly Family, in accordance with the new and everlasting covenant that was propounded before the world was formed.” (pp. 60-62, Fiona Givens and Terryl Givens, The Christ Who Heals: How God Restored the Truth that Saves Us, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2017, 60-62.  See also Terryl Givens, Feeding the Flock: The Foundation of Mormon Thought: Church and Praxis, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017, 313-314.)
     Here is a table that summarizes the two stages or levels of spiritual development discussed above:









The Higher Law and the Experience of Forgiveness





     One of the elements of the “higher law of the gospel” that we have been studying in the Church in the last several weeks, is that we must learn to forgive others their trespasses:
         “For if ye forgive men their trespasses, our Heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.  (Matthew 6:14-15)
     This direction is reinforced in the Doctrine and Covenants:
         Wherefore, I say unto you, that ye ought to forgive one another; for he that forgiveth not his brother his trespasses standeth condemned before the Lord; for there remaineth in him the greater sin.
         I, the Lord, will forgive whom I will forgive, but of you it is required to forgive all men. (D&C 64:9-10)
     I have learned some new things about forgiveness as a I have studied some of the writings of Bruce and Marie Hafen carefully.  Forgiving is surely one of the most complex and challenging gospel principles to implement, especially when it appears to largely involve our innocence and sinful action by the other party.  In my study of some of Elder and Sister Hafen’s writings on this subject, I see some new insights and helps in becoming a better follower of Christ.  They first affirm that the Christ’s Atonement can help a person heal from being hurt by the sins of another person, just as it will pay the price of our own sins. 
     These lessons start with the experience of persons who have been most seriously wounded by others’ transgression.  The Hafens report on what might be nearly the worst case, in which a pair of women who were victims of serious, if not dreadful, abuse in their own homes as children.  From these experiences both of them carried recurrent feelings of fear, guilt, and anger into their adulthood, that seriously impaired their relationships in their own homes and in their adult lives. There were connections between the emotional deprivations experienced in their own childhoods and their adult functioning.  One of the women reported that her preoccupation with her own troubles had caused her to pass some of the distress on to her own family, with the need to overcome “bad mental habits: fear, self-pity, self-condemnation and... unforgiveness.”  She said, “I found I did not have this power to reshape and heal my mind, but Christ did.”
     There appeared to be two negative consequences from these hurtful experiences in the lives of these women.  First, although they were themselves innocent of any original wrong-doing, the results in their own mind and heart were very analogous to the experience of personal guilt.  They seemed to be experiencing the same kind of feelings of self-recrimination and estrangement from God that are or ought to be present when one truly violates the dictates of his or her own conscience.  I wonder if that might also be true for us, as we experience lesser challenges to the need to forgive others, that we too might carry feelings that are analogous to guilt.  Second, these particular experiences may have established a pattern in their own behavior that put them at risk of repeating in relationships in our their later family life, perhaps passing on to their posterity dysfunctional ways of interacting and parenting.  We must be careful about letting our failings in this regard teach our children bad practices.
     Brother and Sister Hafen report on a study performed by a team of BYU researchers on the healing process among victims of child sexual abuse.  Professional counselors have discovered that such child abuse is one of the most damaging and intractable of all human problems.  Some therapists have even questioned whether such victims could ever fully recover.  This team of researchers led by Anne Horton studied the experiences of people who appeared to have made a successful recovery from such abuse and found three important elements of healing, in their words: 1) “final family closure,” 2) “resolution of sexuality issues,” and 3) “spiritual recovery.”  Without delving into the first two elements, the latter, spiritual recovery, almost always included the victim arriving at some sort of forgiveness in regard to the perpetrator.  The third element surprised the researchers (although many of the respondents were members of the Church).  One survivor wrote: “In order to truly feel healed, there must be a type of spiritual recovery, where victims are able to forgive those they feel wronged by, whether it be by the perpetrator, or family member who allowed the abuse to happen, or even God, whom victims often blame for not intervening on their behalf.”
     The Hafens use some unusual words to describe the forgiveness process for persons such as abuse victims, such as “alchemize” and “absorb” and also show a connection of these processes with the work that our Savior performed.
     “...Here are people, often totally innocent, who have been thrust into.the depths of shame, despair, and years of psychic pain–  not by their own mistakes, not even by natural adversity, but sometimes by the deliberate crimes of degraded transgressors.  It seems fair to ask why the victims of abuse should be required to do anything to deserve the Lord's vast healing powers in such a case.  Because abuse victims suffer so many of the same symptoms of guilt and estrangement from God as do willful transgressors, the irony that they should need to forgive those who have wronged them is almost overpowering.
     “Still, there lurks between the lines of the scriptures on forgiveness a message of transcendent meaning– not only about abuse victims but about all of us, and about all of the Atonement.
     “Consider the "transitional figure," [a term suggested be psychologist Alan Bergin, a Church member].  What are we doing when we are willing to absorb a terrible  trauma of the spirit, caused not by our own doing but by one who claimed to love us– and we absorb a the trauma even to help the sinner?  That picture somehow has a familiar look– we've seen all this before.  Of course, because this picture depicts the sacrifice of Jesus Christ: he took upon himself undeserved and unbearable burdens, heaped upon him by people who often said, and often believed, that they loved him.  And he assumed that load not for any need of his, but only to help them.
     “To forgive– not just for abuse victims, but for each of us– is to be a Christ figure,... a transitional point in the war between good and evil, stopping the current of evil by absorbing it in every pore, thereby protecting the innocent next generation and helping to enable the repentance and healing of those whose failures sent the jolt into our own systems.
     “Could it be that we, not only child abuse victims, but all of us, will be accepted of the Lord only as we observe our covenants by the sacrifice of participating in his sacrifice– extending to others the grace he extends to us, and helping to absorb the undeserved trauma that he himself absorbed?
     “Perhaps it is in the nature of belonging to Christ that we "follow him " by letting ourselves belong to others as he does– approximating even in small ways his sacrifice or us through our sacrifice for them.  Perhaps only when we begin to approximate his sacrifice will we comprehend it enough to realize the full impact of its blessings.  Perhaps when his effort combines with ours to move our hearts beyond being broken to being full of charity, in some small way our lives, like his on a larger scale, may represent a fruitful tree, even like the tree of life.  We may then stand like a tree by a pure stream, bearing fruit that helps others develop a taste for the fruit of the real tree of life.  In small and simple ways, we may be participants in his Atonement, agents of his grace through being agents of his charity.”  (Hafen, The Belonging Heart, 122-123)
     Here is a look at the meaning of some of the key words,
Transitional figure:
     A personal link in the pathological family’s intergenerational chain, halts the process by simply absorbing, rather than passing along, the current of harm.  “Instead of seeking retribution, one learns to absorb the pain, to be forgiving, to try to reconcile with forebears, and then becomes a generator of positive change in the next generation.”  (Alan Bergin, in Counseling and Values, 33, (1988) 28-30)
Alchemize:
     To change  the nature or properties of (something),  by a seemingly magical process of transformation, creation, or combination. (Dictionary)
Absorb:
     There are several dictionary definitions of the word “absorb.”  One, “to take in and make part of an existent whole” is absolutely not the meaning here.  In fact, making it a part of yourself is the basis for continuing pain and self-loathing.  A better definition is “to wipe up, to use up, to totally consume.”  This kind of absorbing is what a sponge or towel does, especially to undesired spills, with you yourself as the absorbent material.  There is no after-effect residue or stain in your system or that of later family members.
Atonement (at-one-ment):
     Returning to the first point in this discussion which is that the atonement of Christ will help us heal when we have been wounded by others’ transgression.  The word atonement itself gives clues to this process.  “The word comes from the Middle English attone or atoon (“agreed”, literally “at one”), now meaning to be "at one", in harmony, with someone. (Wikipedia definition).

    “Atonement is primarily about healing the pains and strains of injured relationships incurred en route to [heaven], fractures among ourselves as humans and with those gentle Parents patiently working to improve and guide us (Givens & Givens, The Christ Who Heals, 74).” 
     The hyphenated word at-one-ment suggests being brought into a complete unity, peace, or perfect harmony with God, but may also give clues as how its fruition is experienced.  Just as the absence of its effect in a situation in which one is offended may be experienced as guilt, the achievement of such results could be considered confirmation that one’s efforts at forgiving have been accepted by God.  This result may actually be experienced through the Spirit as a sense of unity (at-oneness, at-peace) with another person and with God.  Thus, sensing this spiritual at-oneness may be a sign that a healing has occurred, at last for your own benefit, and that the atonement of Christ is operative in regard to a situation or relationship.
     Wendy has described a personal experience that seems to illustrate some of this process.  After her divorce from her first husband, experiencing his unfaithfulness, his verbal and emotional abuse, his turning their children against her values, she found herself still lacking direction and peace in her life.  She had turned to the temple and prayer for relief, but was still struggling with these feelings.  One Sunday, while listening to a Sacrament meeting speaker, she experience a spiritual voice telling her that she needed to ask her ex-husband for forgiveness.  She said that she nearly spoke her reaction out loud, “WHAT?”  She felt like this was like being “hit in the head with a brick.”  Nevertheless, when she got home, she determined to be obedient to this prompting.  She carefully drafted a letter asking for forgiveness and put it in the mail.  At the very point of placing the letter in a mailbox, the burden she had been feeling was totally lifted and she felt at peace, that she had now done all that was required of her by her Heavenly Father, and that she could move forward in her life with His full support.

Describing and Understanding the Full Scope of the Atonement of Jesus Christ




What are the meanings and implications of the words we use to describe the most basic element of our faith?  It appears that how we describe what Christ did for us is largely given in terms that are symbolic or metaphorical.  I get some of this from an old book containing a transcription of the lectures that Hugh Nibley gave as instructor of an honors Book of Mormon class at BYU during the late 1980s.  He suggests that the Christian world has struggled with the meanings of these words, and hasn’t always gotten it right.

Here are some of the words and interpretations that exist.

1) Commercial Transaction and Human Bondage inferences (including the trading in slaves).  Christ releases from us from debt or bondage.  He redeems us.  He liberates us or pays the price of our freedom (redeems, liberates, sets free, buys back, recovers, restores, makes payment, remits, releases from debt, ransoms).

2) The concept of Penal Substitution.  Christ absolves us from punishment or guilt (pardons, exonerates, clears, absolves, set frees, liberates, appeases, makes amends).

3) The Damnation or Death metaphor (including spiritual death).  Christ rescues or saves us (removes from danger, extricates, frees, liberates, ransoms, defends, protects).

These metaphors have elements of correct doctrine.  For example, the teachings of Alma (42:13-15) about the laws of justice and mercy are consistent with #1 and #2, where justice must be served but mercy allows Christ to appease its demands for those who will repent, through his own vicarious suffering.  However they do not provide a complete picture of the entire plan of redemption and exaltation.  When the price or ransom is paid or the rescue completed, what then?

Also, there may be false implications in the way these words are sometimes used.  We are not held responsible for Adam’s transgression as says the Article of Faith 2.  Therefore, paying the price for Adam’s choice, or for the resultant extreme level of human depravity depicted by some churches is not relevant.  Neither is Christ needed to assuage the Father’s anger or serve as an advocate or mediator for us with God.

4) Medical need metaphor (heals, fixes, repairs, regenerates, cures, remedies, makes clean, revives, rehabilitates, works a cure, salves, ameliorates).  Fiona and Terryl Givens express a preference for language that speaks to our problems of being wounded and weary rather than being depraved or guilty by nature.  “The term most frequently rendered in the King James Bible as save is the Greek word sodzo...  He who saves is the soter, based on the same word.  But when Luke uses the identical term sodzo, it was to describe Jesus’ act of curing the blind man of his affliction (Luke 18).  Mark also used sodzo when Jesus made the girl whole from the plague (Mark 5).  And Matthew employed the term sodzo when the hemorrhaging woman, touching the Lord’s hem, was restored to health (Matthew 9).  In all these and numerous other cases, the word often translated as save is more aptly rendered heal... In other words, rather than render the Messiah’s title of soter as Savior, we could with equal linguistic justification call him Jesus Christ, Son of God, Healer of the World.  One virtue of such a substitution is that healing signals the beginning of a glorious journey now unfolding, while saving signals its end.”   (The Christ Who Heals, p. 64)

Elder Dale Renlund provides a touching use of this description: “As the Good Shepherd, Jesus Christ views disease in His sheep as a condition that needs treatment, care, and compassion.  This shepherd, our Good Shepherd, finds joy in seeing His diseased sheep progress toward healing.  The Savior foretold that He would “feed his flock like a shepherd... bind up that which [is] broken, and ... strengthen that which [is] sick.” Though apostate Israel was depicted as being consumed with sinful “wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores,” the Savior encouraged, exhorted, and promised healing.” (Cited in Heals, p. 66)

5) Reconciliation metaphor (bring into harmony, assuage, propitiate, mediate, bring together, reunite, make peace, placate, win over, win the goodwill of, create favorable response).  These words seem to imply something more that those above (#1-3) , to be brought together, to be changed back to a prior status, or restored a condition of harmony.  This word seems to be a favorite of recent Biblical translators.  The question Brother Nibley asks of the other churches is “What is the person going back to?”, since they reject the concept of a pre-mortal existence.  The concept of reconciliation, however, for members of our Church, moves in the right direction.

6) Atonement.  This word is used only once in the King James Bible (Romans 5:11) but about 40 times in the Book of Mormon.  Modern Bible translators tend to render this as “reconciliation.”  The word has Old English origins and literally means at-one-ment.  This word is the preference of Brother Nibley, and according to him the original Hebrew word means “changing back again to where you were.”  There are related words or phrases from the same root, which seem to mean to cover (as cover over you sins), to arch over, to bend over, to wipe over, to grasp by the hand, to cleanse, to encircle, to embrace, to hug around, to encircle, similar to 2 Nephi 1:15 or Alma 5:33.  At a basic level the work of at-one-ment can mean to bring together, to bring into harmony, to bind tightly, to unite.  It could also mean to reunite, or be made one with the Father again.

A further meaning of at-one-ment might be to become one or the same as Christ, having the same attributes and characteristics.  This is the notion that in reaching a state of exaltation, we shall be fully like Christ and His Father (Moroni 7:48).  Therefore, the word atonement contains implications of our eternal destiny unmatched by any other word attempting to describe the blessings that Christ’s sacrifice provides.

God designed our life on earth to be a school.  We are not static and acted upon, but we are in the process of learning to value virtue and avoid evil.

The application of all of these differences in terminology might be better understood when the broad reach of the atonement is considered.  Here are concepts of this provided by Tad Callister (April 2019 conference address) and Bruce and Marie Hafen (The Contrite Spirit, 2015):

They list the blessings from the Savior’s atonement:
1) Overcame physical death/resurrection
2) Redeems us/atones for our personal sins
3) Strengthens us in our afflictions/life’s challenges
4) Perfecting blessings/overcoming our imperfections/sanctification/exaltation

Fitting the different concepts and metaphors into this framework suggests to me that the first three metaphors/items find their application in the second blessing, Christ paying the price for our personal sins or granting forgiveness/remission of sins.  This blessing comes initially when we follow the steps to be baptized, and then thereafter as we continue to repent of further mistakes and sins.  It results in our being in a state of forgiveness and eligible for the continuing companionship of the Spirit.  Brother Callister states: “Even though we may believe in Christ’s cleansing powers, the question often arises: “How do I know if I have been forgiven of my sins?” If we feel the Spirit, then that is our witness that we have been forgiven, or that the cleansing process is taking place. President Henry B. Eyring taught, “If you have felt the influence of the Holy Ghost … , you may take it as evidence that the Atonement is working in your life.”

The medical need metaphor (#4) seems largely to require the third, the atonement’s strengthening blessings, to resolve the problems we face that are largely due to adversity, others’ ill treatment,  and the very nature of this world.  Or if not to resolve these problems, to give us strength to endure and persevere.

Finally, the full scope of the blessings of the atonement are ours as we  overcome our weaknesses and imperfections, are supported and sanctified by the Spirit, and ultimately acquire the full, divine nature of Christ.  This is suggested by the concept of reconciliation and especially by the implications contained in the word atonement.

It is instructive the some of the most important and most glorious doctrines of the restored gospel come to us largely through figures of speech or metaphors.  For example, consider the Savior’s use of parables or the temple ceremonies, which are rich in symbolic language.  Is it possible that  English and other languages are simply not capable of expressing spiritual matters very well?
Joseph Smith once lamented the difficulty of expressing spiritual things in what he called “the little narrow prison almost as it were total darkness of paper pen and ink and a crooked broken scattered and imperfect language.” (Joseph Smith to William W. Phelps, 27 November 1832, Joseph Smith Collection, Church History Library, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah.) Because of these challenges in finding ways for expressing spiritual concepts, symbolic language becomes our best or perhaps only option, which is to describe the unfamiliar in terms of things that are familiar.

Here is a beautiful explanation of the use of symbolic language in gospel instruction: “Symbols are the language of feeling, and as such it is not expected that everyone will perceive them the same way.  Like a beautiful cut diamond, they catch the light and then reflect its splendor in a variety of ways.  As viewed at different times and from different positions, what is reflected will differ, yet the diamond and the light remain the same.  Thus symbols, like words, gain richness in their variety of meanings and purposes, which range from revealing to concealing great gospel truths.”   (Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1985, ix)

So, there are perhaps two great positives from using symbolic language to illuminate important spiritual concepts.  First, the variety of symbols, metaphor, analogies, that can be used provide for a range of meanings that may at least nearly encompass our understanding of the spiritual concept; and two, the Spirit can direct our understanding to those things that God want us individually to know and emphasize about the matter, specific things which He knows that we as individuals need.

Thursday, May 23, 2019

Goals for Family



When JoAnn and I got engaged and were first married, we both recognized that there were religious deficiencies in the homes in which we each were raised.  Without disrespecting the efforts of our own parents, we articulated Church-related goals for our own home:
         To be 100 percenters in the Church
         As much as possible to be givers, rather than takers
         To be a part of the solution, not the problem, for our leaders
         To not be on our Church-leaders’ problem list

As I recall, JoAnn got a lot of her motivation for these goals from the example of women in her ward who had worked with her in the Young Womens’ program.  She stated that she wanted her home and family to be “just like those of my Young Womens’ leaders.”

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Someday I’m Going To Murder The Bugler


My mind has developed this odd twist.  I will often wake up with a song going over and over in in my mind.  I call it my Song De Jour.  Often it is a long-forgotten song I learned in my childhood, that I haven’t thought of for years.  In order to get it out of my mind, I have to sing it out loud, usually to Wendy, and it is sometimes kind of fun to reminisce about old songs and old times.  Usually after sharing my song de jour, it leaves my mind and I can think of other things.

This morning the song was rather strange and one I doubt I have even thought of for 60 years or so.  I think it may have come from some old World War I comedic army movie that my parents remembered.  Here it is.

     Someday I’m going to murder the bugler.
     Someday you’ll wake up and find him dead.
     For the heart is full of woe, just to hear the buglar blow,
     “You’ve got to get up, you’ve got to get up,
     you’ve got to get up, this morning.”

     Someday I’m going to murder the bugler.
     Someday you’ll wake up and find him dead.
     And then I’ll get that other pup,
     The one who wakes the bugler up,
     And spend the rest of my life in bed.

Dorothy and I would change the last line to “And spend the rest of your life in jail.”

I sang it to Wendy, and it began to leave my mind as expected. Then my thoughts turned to one of my mother’s rules, this was that you never point a gun, or anything resembling a gun, or anything pretending to be a gun (or weapon, probably including bow-and-arrow or knife) at any other human being.

This was a rule that was ABSOLUTE.  It was something a member of our family NEVER, NEVER EVER did.

When I was with my friends, this rule sure ruined the little boy games of soldiers or cowboys and Indians.  And my mother would have been absolutely appalled and sickened by today’s video games, and would have applied the same prohibition to them.

Somehow this rule impressed me that there was something very sacred about human life, and that we should not even play-act about something that might put these lives at risk.  I think that this was a valuable parenting strategy, that should be utilized in our day to teach this same lesson to our young people and our family.

Friday, April 5, 2019

Mini Temple Tour







Wendy and I did a mini temple tour for first week of April, the first week of three weeks of the Payson temple cleaning closure.  It was not like some of the temple trips we have made with lots of travel.  We stayed within Utah boundaries.  We went to Logan Monday, had dinner with Krysta and Nathan, stayed in a Logan motel that night, then did two sessions on the Logan temple and one more in Brigham City on Tuesday, staying at Soderquist’s house Tuesday night (they were all gone), did two sessions Wednesday at the Ogden temple, made a good visit with Dorothy, and returned to Soderquist’s empty house to sleep Wednesday night, and on Thursday did sessions in the Bountiful and Salt Lake temples, arriving home late Thursday afternoon, having each performed seven endowments in five different temples.  I was especially moved by the session in Salt Lake, as the workers were quite animated and expressive with the revised dialogue, and felt the tears start to come as Eve recited what the Givens have called her “Ode to Joy.”

I felt some sentimental emotions also in Logan, thinking that this was the temple of my great-grandmother, Martha Ann, and that some 130 years ago she was walking these same halls.  This was where my grandparents, Frank and Kate, were married in 1901, and where I was endowed in 1957 with such a marvelous spiritual experience.

We saw old acquaintenances in some of the temples--the Lyle Hendersons who were NC Raleigh missionaries at the same time we served and are now working in the Logan temple.  They are from Clifton, ID, where he was a football coach.  They knew the Chandler-Bells.
We were greeted by Wixoms as left the SL temple (currently Temple President and Matron and she former General Primary President).  Wendy knew her from earlier contacts.  Also in the SL temple we visited with Richard Oldroyd, serving as mens shift coordinator.  I knew him professionally (he was a well-know psychologist in the SL area) and he also had served as Wendy’s bishop.  On our session was a couple (the Duncans) whose wife was Vietnamese and in our branch when I was HC representative to the branch and then later also when the group was assigned to our ward during the time when I was the Bishop.  Her name then was Kim Huynh (Huynh Kim?).  She has served the Church all these years as a General Conference translator.  They have just received a mission call as a senior couple.

The Saints seem to be continuing their recently-found love and commitment to the temple.  All of these seven sessions were reasonably full.  And there were so many smiling faces among the patrons.  I had the thought that Disneyland was mistaken in its promotion of itself.  Our temples just might be the most joyful places on earth, filled with a quiet but wonderful familial and uplifting spirit.

Sunday, March 31, 2019

My Mother's Poetry

Here are two poems written by my mother, found in Dorothy Hall's materials and just sent to me by her son Allen.

          A Transformation on Mother’s Day

One night I had a feeling
    That’s odd as it could be;
It seemed the years had dropped away
    And made a child of me,
And as the sun was setting
    I stood at Mother’s side–
“Child, why are you so quiet?
    Does something hurt inside?”
And I asked her many questions:
    How God could make a tree,
About the stars, and moon, and wind
    That none of us could see;
Why do the tigers have big stripes
    And not the leopards spots,
Why apples fall upon the ground;
    Would pumpkins grow in pots–
Like Grandma keeps her flowers in,
    And does a hornet die
If it should leave its stinger in–
    And why don’t kittens fly?
She surely had great patience–
    She taught me carefully,
And answered every little thought
    That seemed to come to me;
And many times since then I’ve felt
    Her presence by my side;
Though she is many miles away
    She’s still my loving guide.
The things I learned in chldhood
    Are stamped upon my heart,
And I can still remember
    When she told the wiser part
That Mary chose in Bethany
    Of listening to our Lord,
When Martha, faithful worker,
    Spoke one complaining word.

True, we all must be workers,
    And help the best we can
To do our own little bit on earth;
    But yet the Son of Man
Spoke further, of a finer realm
    Of happiness and love–
An ideal home, like Mother said,
    We’d all live in above;
And Mother always tried to help
    Us understand the way.
That’s why I’m just a child again
    On every Mother’s Day.

Hazel Lewis, 1938




         Treasures of a Modern Tree Farm, Near Our Home

Old logging roads, now beckoning trails
To beauty and calmness of mind;
Dogwood shining among the dark firs,
Pale green maple and alder and pine
    Tiny wood-violets, lilac and golden,
    Pungent fragrance of Indian soap-blooms;
    Star-like blossoms of the wild strawberry
    The tips of the firs are soft plumes;
Huge stumps of old forest giants
A rare little white pine tree–
Birds singing among the green willows,
Bees droning and a wind blowing free;
    Deer tracks lead to a steep dugway
    Down the cliff to the roaring white river,
    Deep-green ferns and mossy-damp stones
    And the sudden cool beings a swift shiver;
Surrounded by towering, wooded hills
And topped by a shining blue sky.
Where the distant jet pilot adds plumey clouds
To the treasures of nature near–by!

June 1963 –  BZ Corners – Hazel Lewis

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Political Attitudes Research Insights


     Here are some ideas that have informed my political perspective since my undergraduate college years.  They are based loosely on some post-WWII research by Hans Eysenck, a German-British psychologist.  Eysenck used factor analysis to study political attitudes of persons in a number of countries.  Factor analysis is a statistical technique in which the variability in responses to a wide variety of measures is reduced mathematically to a small number of common factors which explain the majority of the variance in all the measures.  Once identified, these factors are then further analyzed to define them by their relationships to other measures. 
     As I recall (although the literature contains a lot of differing interpretations), Eysenck found only two major factors which accounted for the majority of the variation in political attitudes of his respondents.  The first was a sort of progressive/liberal vs. conservative dimension.  The second dimension was defined as being democratic vs. authoritarian/radical. 
     The first factor, of course is forever being redefined, especially the current perception of what it means to be a liberal.  But it seems to encompass the range of left to right positions in a democracy.
     The second factor seemed largely to differentiate how far a person is willing to go to enforce their views upon others.  This authoritarian/radical end of this continuum is interesting to analyze.  First of all it could represent a danger to democratic forms of government or at its worst, generating even killings or wars.  Interestingly, persons scoring high on authoritarian/radical end this dimension seemed to easily transfer their allegiance on the first dimension.  In other words, it was not uncommon for persons with an authoritarian/radical bent to move from being radical progressives to radical conservatives and vice versa, seemingly to show perhaps that these person are more interested in power than in principle.  We also need to be aware that these dangers exist at bother ends of the progressive/liberal vs. conservative spectrum.  Neither side is immune to radicalization.

Sunday, March 17, 2019

Some Reflections on the Search for Truth and Meaning


     The Savior recited a parable about the actions of a seeker for truth upon finding the greatest of all truths, the kingdom of heaven (the Gospel, God's true Church):
               Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls:
               Who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had,   
          
and bought it. (Matthew 13: 45-46)
     There is a short story by 19th century author Nathaniel Hawthorne, called The Great Stone Face.  In a rural valley there is a rock formation in a nearby hill that is imagined, by many locals and visitors, to resemble the shape and features of a human face.  Local folklore includes a prophecy, alleged to descend from the Native Americans, that at some future date a native son would be born whose features would resemble the Great Stone Face.  People would see him and recognize that he was "the greatest and noblest personage of his time." This prophecy inspires an innocent youngster of the valley, Ernest, who feels within himself the quest to help identify or uncover this hero.
     As time passes, the story of the stone face in the glen becomes well known across the entire country.  Other aspire, unlike Ernest, to be recognized as the hero.  One by one, they visit the valley to seek public recognition and acknowledgment of this resemblance.  But each reveals himself to have character flaws that prevent them from fulfilling the conditions of the prophecy, the latest being a writer.
     Meanwhile, Ernest has become a spry but aged man.  He has progressed from being a hill farmer to the position of local lay preacher.  The writer, who (in contrast to the other contestants) frankly acknowledges his failure to fulfill the prophecy, caps his visit to the valley by attending one of Ernest's impromptu sunset sermons.  By popular demand, the congregation has asked Ernest to deliver his sacred remarks from a site at the base of the hill where the worshipers can see the Great Stone Face high above.
     At the conclusion of Ernest's sermon, the face of Ernest assumed a “grandeur of expression, so imbued with benevolence, that the poet, by an irresistible impulse, threw his arms aloft and shouted, 'Behold! Behold! Ernest is himself the likeness of the Great Stone Face!'  Then all the people looked, and saw that what the deep-sighted poet said was true.  The prophecy was fulfilled.  But Ernest, having finished what he had to say, took the poet's arm, and walked slowly homeward, still hoping that some wiser and better man than himself would by and by appear, bearing a resemblance to the GREAT STONE FACE.”
     This story seems to me to contain the message that virtue and goodness we seek may be closer to home than we might realize. 
     Here are some lines by T. S. Eliot about the search for truth and meaning:
               We shall not case from exploration
               And the end of all our exploring
               Will be to arrive where we started
               And know the place for the first time.
     I relate this to some who are tempted to stray from the Gospel, and then search the whole world for meaning and purpose.  Occasionally they come home to the Church, having discovered that this is where they belonged all along, that nowhere else can a person find greater meaning, purpose, hope, and direction for living.

Friday, February 8, 2019

Why baptism?


Studying the work of John the Baptist, I pondered the meaning of his baptisms.  We know he preached the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins (Luke 3:3).  We know that this ordinance seemed to be that means by which person became his disciples and was a beginning for the preparation of a people who potentially would transfer their discipleship to one greater than he, namely Jesus the Christ.  When this transfer of allegiance occurred, these disciples would be eligible for a second and greater baptism, that of fire and the Holy Ghost.

I pondered my own baptism.  It occurred like this.  I had been praying since I was eight years old that I could be baptized into the Church.  On a Saturday, the day following my graduation from high school, the White Salmon Branch President, Moz Burles, showed up at our house with an invitation.  “Next Saturday at 5 p.m., our branch has scheduled a baptismal service at the Hood River wardhouse.  Why don’t you and Dorothy come and be baptized?”  My mother persuaded my Dad to bring us to that service, and we were baptized and confirmed members of the Church.  My own baptism fulfilled my long-dream to belong to the Church.  I think I also felt a sense that I had drawn closer to God and had more of His approval.

As I reflect back, I see some possible differences from the baptism of John.  As I read the New Testament I sense that, among other things, John was performing a baptism to establish or confirm discipleship.  I do not think that he really had a organized or operating church in the sense that we understand it for persons to join, but rather he was gathering and confirming followers.  I believe the word disciple is rooted the same as the word discipline, in its meaning as a field of study, including the values and life style that might go with that field.  It reflects an ancient schooling method, in which the learner was attached to an expert tutor or master to learn the particular field or craft.  Generally the master in such a situation was recognized as an expert in this field and the disciple or apprentice is seeking to fully emulate his instructor, and not only in acquiring knowledge but in developing the same life skills as his master.

Therefore, it seems to me that becoming a disciple of Christ means to fully accept Christ as our master teacher, and to try our best to emulate his entire way of living.  Might I be bold to say that becoming a true disciple of Christ as we are baptized is even more important than becoming a member of his Church.  The Church is one of the key places for us to practice our discipleship to be sure.  But still, ideally, our commitment to discipleship brings us to the Church, not the other way around.  Without the Church, in our day and time, we could not fully discharge our commitment to being disciples of Christ.  Yet, to the greatest extent possible, we come to the Church as a part of our commitment to serve and exercise our discipleship.  The Church is one of our major scenarios for practicing our Christian commitment, along with our families, within our school/profession/work, within the neighborhood and area in which we reside, etc.  Sometimes it could even be one of our major areas of challenge to this commitment.

The idea of this discipleship being one the major commitments and a driving force behind our actions and thoughts and feelings suggests that we live by a higher law even than just being “active in the Church.”  That higher standard is suggested in the temple, and is that we strive to be “consecrated disciples” of the Lord Jesus Christ.